This explainer is more than 90 days old. Some of the information might be out of date or no longer relevant. Browse our homepage for up to date content or request information about a specific topic from our team of scientists.
This article has been translated from its original language. Please reach out if you have any feedback on the translation.
Excess mortality accounts for all deaths that wouldn't normally occur due to some circumstance like COVID-19. Excess mortality measurements are clearer than total mortality due to a circumstance because they account for differences in how deaths are calculated and when, how capable health systems are of handling enlarged case loads due to COVID-19, how deaths are reported in different regional health systems, how deaths related to the circumstance is defined, and more.
Excess mortality accounts for all deaths that wouldn't normally occur due to some circumstance like COVID-19. Excess mortality measurements are clearer than total mortality due to a circumstance because they account for differences in how deaths are calculated and when, how capable health systems are of handling enlarged case loads due to COVID-19, how deaths are reported in different regional health systems, how deaths related to the circumstance is defined, and more.
Calculating how many people have died because of COVID-19 is a lot more complex than one might think.
Using a measurement like "total mortality" will not likely capture a number of deaths that may be inadvertently caused by COVID-19 or counted that way.
Here is an example: the way the health systems in Russia and Spain measure virus-specific deaths are much different from each other. Russia requires a very resource-intensive autopsy to confirm a COVID-19 death. That means home deaths, deaths "likely" linked to COVID-19 like blood clots and strokes, or deaths due to conditions exacerbated by COVID-19 like heart disease or obesity, may not make the count. On the other hand, Spain's health system requires a positive polymerase chain reaction (PCR) or antibody test. Spain also only includes deaths in hospital settings, which excludes deaths from nursing homes, people without active infections at their time of death, and more.
Now let's compare Russia and Spain with Belgium's much broader definition of a COVID-19 death. In Belgium, COVID-19 death includes all suspected cases, but does not require a positive test, autopsy, or hospitalization for confirmation. Through these comparisons, it's evident how some countries would report more deaths than others. If a person dies in a snowstorm due to hypothermia but had a positive COVID-19 test in recent days, their deaths could technically be counted as a COVID-19 death in some countries but not others.
Because of these differences, most public health measurements use excess mortality as a way to more accurately determine how many people died as a result of the pandemic.
Excess mortality is the difference in the total number of deaths due to some circumstance (like COVID-19), compared to those expected during normal conditions. Another way of phrasing this is the total number of deaths from all causes during a given time period above and beyond what would normally occur in that same time frame had a crisis not occurred.
We are using COVID-19 here as the circumstance, but other circumstances can include events like civil wars, famine, natural disasters, government shutdowns, other viral outbreaks, and more.
Excess mortality is useful as it includes deaths that are directly caused by the virus as well as indirect ones like health system disruptions or a lack of health care.
This specific measurement operates under the assumption that the incidence of other diseases and deaths remain steady over time, but accounts for downward and upward trends in recent years. If we take the example of deaths due to car accidents and roadside injuries which normally increase 1.2% every year in one particular area, we would still use that historical average and 1.2% annual increase in the calculation. We use the expected number of deaths for the same region and period of time using these historical averages, but also include the total deaths that would not have occurred had it not been for COVID-19.
There are many advantages to using excess mortality as a gauge for COVID-19 deaths. Excess mortality is a fairer, more cohesive tool to make international comparisons for these reasons:
Identifying deaths caused by COVID-19 is difficult and not all COVID-19 deaths might be considered excess deaths. Since fewer people died from the flu, there may even be more confirmed COVID-19 deaths than excess deaths that would have occurred from the flu during normal years.
COVID-19 deaths confirmed through testing or autopsies most likely undercount the total impact of the pandemic on a country's mortality but these numbers are constantly changing as the pandemic undergoes several waves. Only excess mortality is able to account for these variations and as such, is a much more reliable indicator for country-to-country comparisons.
Calculating how many people have died because of COVID-19 is a lot more complex than one might think.
Using a measurement like "total mortality" will not likely capture a number of deaths that may be inadvertently caused by COVID-19 or counted that way.
Here is an example: the way the health systems in Russia and Spain measure virus-specific deaths are much different from each other. Russia requires a very resource-intensive autopsy to confirm a COVID-19 death. That means home deaths, deaths "likely" linked to COVID-19 like blood clots and strokes, or deaths due to conditions exacerbated by COVID-19 like heart disease or obesity, may not make the count. On the other hand, Spain's health system requires a positive polymerase chain reaction (PCR) or antibody test. Spain also only includes deaths in hospital settings, which excludes deaths from nursing homes, people without active infections at their time of death, and more.
Now let's compare Russia and Spain with Belgium's much broader definition of a COVID-19 death. In Belgium, COVID-19 death includes all suspected cases, but does not require a positive test, autopsy, or hospitalization for confirmation. Through these comparisons, it's evident how some countries would report more deaths than others. If a person dies in a snowstorm due to hypothermia but had a positive COVID-19 test in recent days, their deaths could technically be counted as a COVID-19 death in some countries but not others.
Because of these differences, most public health measurements use excess mortality as a way to more accurately determine how many people died as a result of the pandemic.
Excess mortality is the difference in the total number of deaths due to some circumstance (like COVID-19), compared to those expected during normal conditions. Another way of phrasing this is the total number of deaths from all causes during a given time period above and beyond what would normally occur in that same time frame had a crisis not occurred.
We are using COVID-19 here as the circumstance, but other circumstances can include events like civil wars, famine, natural disasters, government shutdowns, other viral outbreaks, and more.
Excess mortality is useful as it includes deaths that are directly caused by the virus as well as indirect ones like health system disruptions or a lack of health care.
This specific measurement operates under the assumption that the incidence of other diseases and deaths remain steady over time, but accounts for downward and upward trends in recent years. If we take the example of deaths due to car accidents and roadside injuries which normally increase 1.2% every year in one particular area, we would still use that historical average and 1.2% annual increase in the calculation. We use the expected number of deaths for the same region and period of time using these historical averages, but also include the total deaths that would not have occurred had it not been for COVID-19.
There are many advantages to using excess mortality as a gauge for COVID-19 deaths. Excess mortality is a fairer, more cohesive tool to make international comparisons for these reasons:
Identifying deaths caused by COVID-19 is difficult and not all COVID-19 deaths might be considered excess deaths. Since fewer people died from the flu, there may even be more confirmed COVID-19 deaths than excess deaths that would have occurred from the flu during normal years.
COVID-19 deaths confirmed through testing or autopsies most likely undercount the total impact of the pandemic on a country's mortality but these numbers are constantly changing as the pandemic undergoes several waves. Only excess mortality is able to account for these variations and as such, is a much more reliable indicator for country-to-country comparisons.
There are several limitations to using excess mortality as a way to determine how many people have died because of COVID-19. However, by comparison, total mortality rates are much less accurate and much more speculative. Excess mortality, at least when nations have similar abilities in terms of reporting death, applies a holistic context on the true impact of COVID-19.
We do not have this mortality data for every country which weakens the accuracy of any calculations. In order to monitor the pandemic's impact, many contextual considerations such at this should be included.
There are several limitations to using excess mortality as a way to determine how many people have died because of COVID-19. However, by comparison, total mortality rates are much less accurate and much more speculative. Excess mortality, at least when nations have similar abilities in terms of reporting death, applies a holistic context on the true impact of COVID-19.
We do not have this mortality data for every country which weakens the accuracy of any calculations. In order to monitor the pandemic's impact, many contextual considerations such at this should be included.